Nigeria and France: Geopolitical Rivals No More
How accurate is the widespread perception that Nigeria and France remain locked in an adversarial rivalry in West Africa?
President Muhammadu Buhari and President Francois Hollande
meet on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Schloss Elmau, Germany. Photo Credit:
Getty Images/AFP. |
Reading Bassey and Dokubo’s monumental tome, Defence Policy of Nigeria: Capability and
Context, one gets the impression that for Nigeria’s foreign policy
elites France remains a formidable obstacle to the country’s regional ambition
and an enduring threat to national security. As the authors observe:
The pervasive and
tenacious involvement of France in West-Central Africa has been widely seen by
Nigerian defence planners as constituting a direct affront to its national
security and also impeding the growth of the country’s political, economic and
cultural interests in the region.
France’s politico-military presence all across West-Central
Africa, the authors unequivocally conclude, means the “antagonistic
relationship between Nigeria and France [will] arguably … continue in the
foreseeable future”. This view is widely shared by most Nigerians and is
rooted in the mutual distrust and adversarial rivalry which once marked
bilateral relations between Nigeria and France.
Geopolitical Rivalry
France looms large in Nigeria’s foreign policy thinking and the
country has traditionally been seen as a rival for hegemonic influence in West
Africa. France for its part has traditionally sought to retain control over the
affairs of its former colonies and Nigeria’s size immediately marked it out as
a threat to its hegemony in francophone West Africa.
Diplomatic relations were established on October 1st
1960, following Nigeria’s independence. Relations however got off to a bad
start. In January 1961, in protest at
France’s third
atomic test in the Sahara desert, Nigeria broke
relations with France, sent the French ambassador packing, “placed [an] embargo on French shipping and
aircraft, [and] froze French assets in the country”.
Franco-Nigerian relations reached their lowest ebb during Nigeria’s civil war
when France played a leading role in sustaining the rebellion. A January 1969
memo sent by the-then US National Security Adviser, Henry Kissinger, to
President Nixon underscores the decisive impact of France’s material support to the rebel cause:
The Feds [Federal Government]
out-number the Biafrans 2:1 ... but French arms and higher morale give the
Biafrans parity for the present [time]... The French are behind the arms
flights from neighbouring Gabon that save the rebels. They think the Feds will
break up first and they will have a dynamic new client amid the wreckage of an
Anglo-American dream in Africa.
Michael Anda, in his interesting comparative study on the International Relations in Contemporary
Africa, notes that:
De Gaulle’s policy of
support for Biafra in 1968-1969 was largely motivated by geopolitical
considerations and was intended to dismantle the Nigerian state, which was
considered as a pole of attraction (and thus a potential threat) to the
preservation of French influence in the neighbouring Francophone states.
As a result of this, reducing France’s politico-military
presence in West Africa became one of the cardinal objectives of Nigeria’s foreign policy. France came to be seen as not only a geopolitical rival,
but a national security threat.
Immediately after the civil war Nigerian officials set about
building an economic community that would encompass the entire region. They
reasoned that through economic interdependence, francophone West Africa will
gradually be pulled under the country’s wings. France, fearing loss of
influence, tried to scupper the initiative. When that proved futile – ECOWAS
was eventually established in May 1975 – France encouraged its West African
clients to pre-empt Nigeria’s initiative by forming their own organisation – West
African Economic Community (CEAO), established in April 1973 – so they can
“coordinate their efforts to counterbalance against the heavyweight of Nigeria”
within the soon to be established ECOWAS.
French policy during the Chadian civil war in the early
1980s frustrated Nigeria’s diplomatic initiatives to end the conflict. France’s
and the US’ support for Hissene Habre were primarily aimed at installing an
anti-Ghaddafi client in N’Djamena to forestall a feared “gradual
political union” between Chad and Libya which the previous Head of State
had signed up to. This meddling nevertheless undermined the Nigerian-led
AU peacekeeping mission in Chad. It also further reinforced feelings in Lagos
that Paris was resolutely determined to thwart Nigeria’s regional ambitions at
every turn.
In the 1980s the view
within the foreign ministry was that “in order to be credible, Nigeria’s
defence policy must … be determined by the need to deter the most entrenched
European power in West Africa, France”. ‘Deter’ in this context meaning to
reduce France’s free hand in the region by building a military capable of both
challenging its interventionist policies and eventually replacing it as an
order provider in francophone West Africa.
General Babangida’s State visit to France in February 1990, the
first by a Nigerian leader, seemed to herald a new era in bilateral
relations. But relations sharply nosedived in 1994 when the Nigerian government
accused
France of deploying troops into the Bakassi peninsula to take command of
Cameroonian forces during a period of heightened tension between Nigeria and
Cameroon. A claim French authorities vehemently denied.
Geopolitical Rivals No More
Franco-Nigerian relations have however significantly
improved in the past decade and a half. Bilateral relations are now marked by pragmatic
cooperation. Both countries have slowly accepted that each other’s roles in
West Africa are “complementary
rather than competitive”. Nigeria and France are geopolitical rivals no
more. Bassey’s and Dokubo’s characterisation of an “antagonistic relationship”
is therefore simply not reflective of current realities.
France’s military presence that once posed a formidable national
security threat, has now become crucial both for Nigeria’s security and for
broader regional stability. The 3000 French troops spread across five countries
in the Sahel – as part of operation Barkhane – are what stand between Nigeria
and the chaos in Libya. They are also what keeps Al-Qaeda in the Islamic
Maghreb at bay. French intervention in the Central African Republic in December
2013 saved that country from collapsing into genocidal bloodshed.
The
humanitarian and security crisis that would have spawned from uncontrolled
chaos in CAR would have undoubtedly strained Cameroonian and Chadian resources
to breaking point, and inevitably impacted on their ability to meaningfully
take on Boko Haram.
France’s previous penchant for stymieing Nigeria on the
regional stage has appreciably reduced, if not disappeared altogether. The past
few years has witnessed a remarkable rapprochement and an unprecedented
alignment of views on regional security. In many cases France has actively
encouraged Nigeria, either bilaterally or through ECOWAS, to take a greater leadership role in crisis management – even in francophone West Africa.
When political crisis and civil war erupted in Cote d’Ivoire
following Laurent Gbagbo’s refusal to step down after losing the 2010
Presidential election, Nigeria and France coordinated their response to the
crisis – culminating in a jointly
sponsored UN resolution calling on Gbagbo to hand over power.
Similarly in
the Mali crisis, from all indications the strong preference in Paris was for the AU and the Nigerian-led ECOWAS to take the lead, with France playing a
supporting role. France was eventually thrust into intervention by the rapidly deteriorating situation. Jean-Christophe
Belliard, a senior French diplomat, at a Chatham House presentation discussing French
policy in Africa described how as the crisis unfolded, France’s Foreign and
Defence Ministers consulted with the AU, ECOWAS, and African presidents,
including Nigeria’s, “to exchange ideas on the situation in Mali”. This is a
far cry from the adversarial relationship of the past.
More recently, the security summit hosted by France in May
2014 facilitated the rapprochement between Nigeria and its two Central African
neighbours, Cameroon and Chad, and laid the foundation for the soon to be
established anti-Boko Haram regional coalition.
The French
Development Agency
(AFD) recently contributed $130 million to the establishment of the Development
Bank of Nigeria. Since the opening of its Nigerian branch in 2008, AFD has
so far committed about
$694 million to various project in the country.
President Chirac’s State Visit to
Nigeria in July 1999 was the first by a foreign Head of State to the
country after its return to democratic rule in May of the same year. And
President Sarkozy was the only major world leader to attend Nigeria’s Centenary
celebration in 2014.
These are all indications of the more positive and
cooperative atmosphere that currently prevails in Franco-Nigerian bilateral
relations. French economic interests in Nigeria has also served to reinforce
the positive trajectory in bilateral relations. Trade between the two countries
and French investment in Nigeria has grown in leaps and bounds.
In sub-Saharan
Africa, Nigeria is France’s largest
trading partner (5.1 billion Euros in 2012) and the second largest export
destination for its goods (value of exports was 1.3 billion Euros in 2012).
French investments in Nigeria dwarf those in francophone West and Central
Africa. Its major multinational corporations – such as Elf, Lafarge, Peugeot,
and “over
a hundred” other subsidiaries and joint ventures – have significant
presence in Nigeria.
This is not to suggest Nigeria and France have identical
regional interests or that geopolitical competition has permanently disappeared
as an organising principle of Franco-Nigerian relations. It is merely to point
out that the current overlap and convergence of interests between the two
countries makes the notion of an ongoing geopolitical rivalry unreflective of
contemporary Franco-Nigerian relations.
Comments
Post a Comment