The Economic Impact of the Postponement: Stability Deferred
Image: BBC |
On Saturday, 7th of January, the Independent
National Electoral Commission (INEC) announced that after careful deliberation
it was acceding to the demands of the National Security Adviser (NSA) and the Service
Chiefs to postpone the General Elections for six weeks. The new dates the
Commission’s Chairman announced were now to be March 28 (Presidential and Federal Legislative elections) and April 11 (Gubernatorial and State
Legislative elections). Much has already been written about the wide-spread
suspicion which has greeted the postponement. Remi Adekoya’s article in The Guardian, Karen Attiah’s article
in The Washington Post, and Tolu
Ogunlesi’s article in the Financial Times, give a good sense
of this general scepticism – much of which I share.
In this article I instead highlight the implications
and impact of the postponement on the country’s economic stability.
Stability Deferred
The ebullient glow that once permeated perceptions of
Nigeria’s economic health has given way to an undercurrent of uncertainty. As
the curtain dropped on 2014, plunging oil prices unleashed a trifecta of woes –
reduced government revenues, foreshadowing a period of austerity; looming
currency crisis, due to downward pressures on the Naira; and dwindling foreign
reserves, as the Central Bank throws dollars into the market to stem the Naira’s
slide – that are now weighing down the economy. Data now suggests that last year foreign investors reportedly pulled out N846.5bn ($4.5bn) from the stock
market – 65%
more than in 2013; a sign of waning investor confidence. And the Nigerian
Stock Exchange (NSE) was
billed as the worst performer among the major African exchanges in 2014 as
investors stayed back and major multinationals whittled down their investments pending
a clearer sense of the government’s fiscal policy direction in this changed
economic landscape.
The proposed 2015 “transition”
budget unveiled in December last year only deepened the uncertainty. Rather
than charting a realistic path out of austerity, its thrust seemed geared
towards attracting votes with populist, but inconsequential, measures like the
“luxury tax”. Four
of its key assumptions – oil production, 2.278m barrels/day; oil price,
$65/barrel; exchange rate, N165/$; oil revenue, N1.92tr ($9.6bn) – were quickly
dismissed as unrealistic by analysts as soon as the budget was presented.
Postponing the elections to March and April now means tackling
these pressing problems have also been effectively deferred till the middle of
this year when the almost inevitable unrest that will follow the elections
(whoever wins) subsides. It also means that the tough measures for stabilising
the economy that the political class need to start debating have been postponed
till election fever dies down. After all, in election season, who wants to start
discussing such unpopular measures as retrenchment of government employees/slashing
government wages, removal/reduction of subsidies, capital controls to stem the
flight of investor funds, accepting a devalued Naira rather than depleting the
foreign reserves to vainly defend it etc.
Unsurprisingly, the Monday after the election postponement
saw the Naira plummet to historic lows against the dollar – a
declining trend that has continued – as investors
sold off their holdings in the bond and equities market. Of the 30 markets
tracked by the “World Market
Indices”, the NSE, on the day after the postponement, was one of the worst
performers – second only to Greece’s stock exchange.
More than a vote postponed therefore, by extending the
election season for a further six weeks, government has also deferred the
critical time when tough decisions will have to be made to stabilise the
economy. And as we know: The longer a crisis persists, the narrower the range
of options become, and the harder it becomes to manage.
Comments
Post a Comment